Last month, valerian failed its tests: the better the trial, the less it found. Lavender is the opposite case. A lavender oil capsule has some of the most consistent placebo-controlled results of any herb. That’s a reason to look harder, not a reason to relax. Every one of those trials was run by the manufacturer, and the sleep effect turns out to come almost entirely from somewhere else.
I don’t reach for capsules when someone has anxiety. I start with what’s feeding it: caffeine, alcohol, sleep debt, blood sugar swings, the workload someone actually carries. Those move anxiety more reliably than anything in a bottle, and they don’t come with a monthly bill. What I see often is the swap: someone wary of a benzodiazepine prescription, or trying to come off one, looking for the same quieting effect with a natural label. Lavender oil capsules are marketed at exactly that person, so I came to this expecting industry gloss over thin evidence. The trials turned out better than I expected, with a catch about who ran them that’s worth knowing before you spend money.
“Lavender” covers two things with very different evidence:
Below, each one is graded separately.
The meta-analysis says it plainly: all the trials “were initiated by the manufacturer of Silexan and performed in one country (Germany)”, and the authors searched the trial registers and found no independent ones (Dold et al., 2023). Schwabe employees are authors on the trials and the pooled analyses, which used individual patient data supplied by the company.
The pattern continues. A 2024 trial in mild-to-moderate depression (498 people) found Silexan beat placebo by about 2 points on a 60-point depression scale, similar to the antidepressant sertraline. Like every Silexan trial before it, it was sponsored by Schwabe (Kasper et al., 2024; Roebuck et al., 2026).
The first independent trial is under way. The STOP trial, run by Deakin University and Phoenix Australia, is testing Silexan 160 mg a day against placebo for 12 weeks as an add-on treatment for PTSD, in a planned 278 adults. Its authors describe it as “the first clinical trial of Silexan conducted by a research team that is independent of the company”. It was registered in May 2024 and its protocol was published in 2026. There are no results yet (Roebuck et al., 2026). It’s a PTSD trial, so even when it reports, it won’t directly repeat the anxiety results. But it will be the first time anyone outside the company has tested this extract blind.
None of that makes the results wrong. The trials are well designed: double-blind, and the placebo capsules were flavoured with a trace of lavender so people couldn’t tell by the smell. But I’d say the same about a drug: one company’s trials, never repeated by anyone else, is a reason for caution.
Sleep improved in the anxiety trials. In one trial of 221 people with anxiety and poor sleep, sleep quality scores improved by 5.5 points on Silexan against 3.8 on placebo (Kasper et al., 2010).
But the manufacturer’s own analysis asked why sleep improved. It found that more than 98% of the sleep effect came through reduced anxiety, and almost none directly (Seifritz et al., 2019; Seifritz et al., 2022). It also doesn’t sedate: in a driving-simulator trial, 80 mg was equivalent to placebo (Möller et al., 2020).
So if worry keeps you awake, the capsule has a case. If you’re not anxious and just sleep badly, no trial has tested it for you.
There are many meta-analyses of lavender aromatherapy for sleep. Nearly all find an improvement:
The problem is built into the method. You can’t hide the smell of lavender, so most trials compare lavender with nothing, or with a scent people can tell apart. Sleep is measured by questionnaire. That’s the situation where expectation does most. A pleasant bedtime ritual may well help. That’s worth having, but the trials can’t tell you whether lavender itself does anything.
Smell is a different route from a capsule, and it’s personal. If you like the scent and it’s part of how you wind down, that’s a reasonable choice. Just don’t expect the capsule trials to tell you anything about the spray.
In lab studies, Silexan dampens calcium channels in nerve cells. In a small brain-scan study of 17 healthy men, eight weeks of 160 mg a day changed serotonin-1A receptor binding (Baldinger et al., 2015). Both are plausible routes to an effect on anxiety. Neither has been shown to explain the trial results.
For generalised anxiety, psychological therapy has a larger effect than medicines in trials (effect size 0.76 against 0.38). The authors warn that the two can’t be compared directly, because medicine trials use placebo controls (Carl et al., 2020). It’s available through the NHS; ask your GP. For sleep without anxiety, the first-line treatment remains CBT for insomnia, as in last month’s valerian piece.
And the Test, Don’t Guess question: what is the anxiety attached to? Lavender doesn’t answer that. Sleep, caffeine, alcohol, blood sugar swings, thyroid, a life situation: a two-week diary of mood, sleep and what you ate and drank often shows more than any capsule.
This month’s supplement is glycine, tested for sleep to the same standard. This month’s recipe is the nightcap without the alcohol.
PubMed records resolved and abstracts read 28 October 2026; every PMID and DOI re-checked against PubMed 8 November 2026.
Bagheri L, Ghiasi A, Biabani F. Effects of aromatherapy on menopausal symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Obstet Gynaecol 2026;46(1):2723303. PMID 42709539. doi:10.1080/01443615.2026.2723303
Baldinger P, et al. Effects of Silexan on the serotonin-1A receptor and microstructure of the human brain: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, cross-over study with molecular and structural neuroimaging. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2015;18(4) (online 2014). PMID 25522403. doi:10.1093/ijnp/pyu063
Carl E, et al. Psychological and pharmacological treatments for generalized anxiety disorder (GAD): a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Cogn Behav Ther 2020;49(1):1–21 (online 2019). PMID 30760112. doi:10.1080/16506073.2018.1560358
Dold M, et al. Efficacy of Silexan in patients with anxiety disorders: a meta-analysis of randomized, placebo-controlled trials. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2023;273(7):1615–1628. PMID 36717399. doi:10.1007/s00406-022-01547-w
Doroshyenko O, et al. Drug cocktail interaction study on the effect of the orally administered lavender oil preparation silexan on cytochrome P450 enzymes in healthy volunteers. Drug Metab Dispos 2013;41(5):987–993. PMID 23401474. doi:10.1124/dmd.112.050203
Henley DV, Lipson N, Korach KS, Bloch CA. Prepubertal gynecomastia linked to lavender and tea tree oils. N Engl J Med 2007;356(5):479–485. PMID 17267908. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa064725
Kalms Lavender One-A-Day Capsules (lavender oil 80 mg), patient information leaflet. Registration holder and manufacturer: Dr. Willmar Schwabe GmbH & Co. KG. THR 05332/0008. MHRA products database, read 8 November 2026. Leaflet (PDF)
Kalms One-A-Day lavender oil 80 mg capsules, product listing and label text, Rowlands Pharmacy (shop.rowlandspharmacy.co.uk), read 28 October 2026.
Kasper S, et al. Lavender oil preparation Silexan is effective in generalized anxiety disorder — a randomized, double-blind comparison to placebo and paroxetine. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2014;17(6):859–869. PMID 24456909. doi:10.1017/S1461145714000017
Kasper S, et al. Lavender oil preparation Silexan is effective in mild-to-moderate major depression: a randomized, placebo- and reference-controlled trial. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2025;275(6):1693–1703 (online 2024). PMID 38558147. doi:10.1007/s00406-024-01783-2
Kasper S, et al. Silexan, an orally administered Lavandula oil preparation, is effective in the treatment of ‘subsyndromal’ anxiety disorder: a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial. Int Clin Psychopharmacol 2010;25(5):277–287. PMID 20512042. doi:10.1097/YIC.0b013e32833b3242
Möller HJ, et al. Silexan does not affect driving performance after single and multiple dose applications: results from a double-blind, placebo and reference-controlled study in healthy volunteers. J Psychiatr Res 2020;136:543–551. PMID 33221027. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2020.10.028
Ostovar M, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials on lavender for sleep disorders in older adults. Exp Gerontol 2025;211:112919. PMID 41057090. doi:10.1016/j.exger.2025.112919
Ramsey JT, et al. Lavender products associated with premature thelarche and prepubertal gynecomastia: case reports and endocrine-disrupting chemical activities. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2019;104(11):5393–5405. PMID 31393563. doi:10.1210/jc.2018-01880
Roebuck G, et al. The Silexan in the Treatment Of Posttraumatic stress disorder (STOP) trial: protocol for a 12-week randomised controlled trial of adjunctive Silexan for PTSD. BMC Complement Med Ther 2026;26(1). PMID 41736003. doi:10.1186/s12906-026-05312-7. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06412757.
Seifritz E, et al. Effect of anxiolytic drug silexan on sleep — a narrative review. World J Biol Psychiatry 2022;23(7):493–500. PMID 36259937. doi:10.1080/15622975.2021.2013092
Seifritz E, et al. No abuse potential of Silexan in healthy recreational drug users: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2021;24(3):171–180. PMID 33300578. doi:10.1093/ijnp/pyaa064
Seifritz E, Schläfke S, Holsboer-Trachsler E. Beneficial effects of Silexan on sleep are mediated by its anxiolytic effect. J Psychiatr Res 2019;115:69–74. PMID 31121394. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2019.04.013
Shen H, Zhang LJ, Zhu WY. The sleep-enhancing effect of lavender essential oil in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Holist Nurs Pract 2025;40(2):105–118. PMID 40600743. doi:10.1097/HNP.0000000000000734
Woelk H, Schläfke S. A multi-center, double-blind, randomised study of the Lavender oil preparation Silexan in comparison to Lorazepam for generalized anxiety disorder. Phytomedicine 2010;17(2):94–99 (online 2009). PMID 19962288. doi:10.1016/j.phymed.2009.10.006
Zhang W, et al. Medicinal herbs for the treatment of anxiety: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Pharmacol Res 2022;179:106204. PMID 35378276. doi:10.1016/j.phrs.2022.106204